On 7 May 2014 16:45, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> This is a repost of the arm64 crypto patches that I have posted to the LAKML >> over the past months. They have now been verified on actual hardware >> (Cortex-A57) so if there are no remaining issues I would like to propose them >> for 3.16. >> >> Ard Biesheuvel (15): >> asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it >> arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation >> arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume >> arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context >> arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >> arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >> arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >> arm64/crypto: AES using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >> arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions >> arm64: pull in <asm/simd.h> from asm-generic >> arm64/crypto: AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 NEON and Crypto >> Extensions >> arm64/crypto: add shared macro to test for NEED_RESCHED >> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1 >> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA2 >> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions GHASH > > There are about 5 patches that make sense to me ;) and apart from a few > minor comments they look fine. > > There are the other 10 crypto patches that are beyond my knowledge. Do > you know anyone who could do a sanity check on them? Are there any tests > that would show the correctness of the implementation? > I will re-send the 3 FPSIMD patches separately with your review comments addressed. -- Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
