On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > This is a repost of the arm64 crypto patches that I have posted to the LAKML > over the past months. They have now been verified on actual hardware > (Cortex-A57) so if there are no remaining issues I would like to propose them > for 3.16. > > Ard Biesheuvel (15): > asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it > arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation > arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume > arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context > arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions > arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions > arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions > arm64/crypto: AES using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions > arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions > arm64: pull in <asm/simd.h> from asm-generic > arm64/crypto: AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 NEON and Crypto > Extensions > arm64/crypto: add shared macro to test for NEED_RESCHED > arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1 > arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA2 > arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions GHASH There are about 5 patches that make sense to me ;) and apart from a few minor comments they look fine. There are the other 10 crypto patches that are beyond my knowledge. Do you know anyone who could do a sanity check on them? Are there any tests that would show the correctness of the implementation? Thanks. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
