On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:47:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > The inline and not inline performance is quite similar. I guess the > > little difference here and there is due to some random ctx switches (I > > Are you sure you were not just IO bound? It would have been better > to test in memory (e.g. using ramfs or just some direct test client) He tested with tcrypt which is definitely not IO bound. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
