* Herbert Xu | 2008-01-10 20:27:46 [+1100]: >On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:25:55AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> Then I don't think the patch should have been applied. > >I disagree. There isn't any evidence showing that the inlined version >is significantly faster either. In the absence of that, the version >with the smaller size is preferable. I tried to get rid of all those macros in AES and replace them with static only. I noticed that this makes the implementation slower. The performance increased a little after switch to static inline but was still less than with those macros. Unfortunately I had not the time to investigate it any further. Sebastian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
