On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:35:00AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > I checked it and cra_driver_name is only used for compare. I think you > could use something like "cbc(aes-asm)" but this would only work on x86. > Is there something I am overlooking? That's the whole point of cra_driver_name. Consider the case of someone who has a higher priority version of AES available, e.g., padlock or an async device. If they want to specify the assembly version of AES then they would use cbc(aes-asm). Just as they would use cbc(aes-generic) to select the C version. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
