On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > Two last questions: > - What about the i386 assembly vs generic implementation? Do you prefer > the patch that I have send earlier (choose the assembly by default > making the generic optional) or do you want both of them loaded at > the same time. I'd prefer both to be built by default so that if something does go wrong we can ask people to check by using aes-generic. > - What might be the best fallback strategy for the s390 + geode aes > driver? I've been trying to avoid this :) Yes your proposal is definitely on the right track. My original plan is to have a template like keylen(aes,16) that only supports key length 16. So perhaps you can take a look at doing that or come up with a different solution. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
