Hi Eric, On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:53:34AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> writes: > > > Am 01.12.2014 um 02:29 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: > >>>>>> Any chance you can test that with Eric's patch or mine [1] applied? > >>>>>> If that doesn't work, can you try to catch the failure with strace? > >>>>> > >>>>> With your patch applied on top of Linus's tree as of today libvirt-lxc works fine again. :) > >>>> > >>>> *Scratches head* > >>>> > >>>> Did you really have my latest patch applied? > >>>> > >>>> Andy's patch implies a change of policy that I really don't want to > >>>> deploy as a bug fix. > >>> > >>> Hmm, let me double check this tomorrow with a fresh brain. > >>> Maybe I got hit by another issue while testing your patch. > >>> Currently I'm fighting against three libvirt-lxc issues in parallel. :-\ > >> > >> Please do. I just reran through my regression tests that explore this > >> issue rather throughly and all of my remount test cases are passing. So > >> if things are truly failing I want to understand what is going on, and > >> add to my regression tests. > >> > >> I should have done that sooner of course but I am still paging back in > >> after being distracted with the other things in life. > > > > I can confirm that your patch "mnt: Implicitly add MNT_NODEV on remount as we do on mount" > > unbreaks libvirt-lxc too. :-) > > Sorry for the false negative. > > Thanks I will add your Tested-by. > > Eric Cedric help to test my kernel that included your patch. Please feel free to add: Tested-by: Cedric Bosdonnat <cbosdonnat@xxxxxxxx> Regards Joey Lee _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
