Am 01.12.2014 um 02:29 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: >>>>> Any chance you can test that with Eric's patch or mine [1] applied? >>>>> If that doesn't work, can you try to catch the failure with strace? >>>> >>>> With your patch applied on top of Linus's tree as of today libvirt-lxc works fine again. :) >>> >>> *Scratches head* >>> >>> Did you really have my latest patch applied? >>> >>> Andy's patch implies a change of policy that I really don't want to >>> deploy as a bug fix. >> >> Hmm, let me double check this tomorrow with a fresh brain. >> Maybe I got hit by another issue while testing your patch. >> Currently I'm fighting against three libvirt-lxc issues in parallel. :-\ > > Please do. I just reran through my regression tests that explore this > issue rather throughly and all of my remount test cases are passing. So > if things are truly failing I want to understand what is going on, and > add to my regression tests. > > I should have done that sooner of course but I am still paging back in > after being distracted with the other things in life. I can confirm that your patch "mnt: Implicitly add MNT_NODEV on remount as we do on mount" unbreaks libvirt-lxc too. :-) Sorry for the false negative. Thanks, //richard _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
