Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> writes: > Am 01.12.2014 um 02:29 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: >>>>>> Any chance you can test that with Eric's patch or mine [1] applied? >>>>>> If that doesn't work, can you try to catch the failure with strace? >>>>> >>>>> With your patch applied on top of Linus's tree as of today libvirt-lxc works fine again. :) >>>> >>>> *Scratches head* >>>> >>>> Did you really have my latest patch applied? >>>> >>>> Andy's patch implies a change of policy that I really don't want to >>>> deploy as a bug fix. >>> >>> Hmm, let me double check this tomorrow with a fresh brain. >>> Maybe I got hit by another issue while testing your patch. >>> Currently I'm fighting against three libvirt-lxc issues in parallel. :-\ >> >> Please do. I just reran through my regression tests that explore this >> issue rather throughly and all of my remount test cases are passing. So >> if things are truly failing I want to understand what is going on, and >> add to my regression tests. >> >> I should have done that sooner of course but I am still paging back in >> after being distracted with the other things in life. > > I can confirm that your patch "mnt: Implicitly add MNT_NODEV on remount as we do on mount" > unbreaks libvirt-lxc too. :-) > Sorry for the false negative. Thanks I will add your Tested-by. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
