On 09/04/2013 05:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 11:20 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:58:30AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:42:26AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Jan Kaluza <jkaluza@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
this patchset against net-next (applies also to linux-next) adds 3 new types
of "Socket"-level control message (SCM_AUDIT, SCM_PROCINFO and SCM_CGROUP).
By my count you have overflowed cb in struct sk_buff and are stomping on
_skb_refdest.
For patch1/3 I count 56/48, then for patch3 I get 48/48. Jan, you might
do the conversion to a pointer in patch1/3 to avoid bisect breakage.
Wait, that __aligned(8) is for cb[48], not for the contents.
For patch1/3 I count 28/48 on 32-bit, 36/48 on 64-bit (or would that be
56 by default on 64-bit arches without aligned specified?), then for
patch3 I get 24/48 on 32 and 40/48 on 64 (or again 48/48 by default?).
Do not count, just add this :
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 86de99a..5b61320 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1329,6 +1329,7 @@ static void unix_detach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int i;
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct unix_skb_parms) > sizeof(skb->cb));
scm->fp = UNIXCB(skb).fp;
UNIXCB(skb).fp = NULL;
That's already in af_unix.c:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct unix_skb_parms) > FIELD_SIZEOF(struct
sk_buff, cb));
This test is passing for me even with only patch1/3 applied when
building 64bit kernel.
Jan Kaluza
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
