On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:42:26AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Jan Kaluza <jkaluza@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Hi, > > > > this patchset against net-next (applies also to linux-next) adds 3 new types > > of "Socket"-level control message (SCM_AUDIT, SCM_PROCINFO and SCM_CGROUP). > > > > Server-like processes in many cases need credentials and other > > metadata of the peer, to decide if the calling process is allowed to > > request a specific action, or the server just wants to log away this > > type of information for auditing tasks. > > > > The current practice to retrieve such process metadata is to look that > > information up in procfs with the $PID received over SCM_CREDENTIALS. > > This is sufficient for long-running tasks, but introduces a race which > > cannot be worked around for short-living processes; the calling > > process and all the information in /proc/$PID/ is gone before the > > receiver of the socket message can look it up. > > > Changes introduced in this patchset can also increase performance > > of such server-like processes, because current way of opening and > > parsing /proc/$PID/* files is much more expensive than receiving these > > metadata using SCM. > > Can I just say ick, blech, barf, gag. /me hands ebiederman an air sickness bag. > You don't require this information to be passed. You are asking people > to suport a lot of new code for the forseeable future. The only advantage > appears to be for short lived racy processes that don't even bother to > make certain their message was acknowleged before exiting. > > You sent this during the merge window which is the time for code > integration and testing not new code. This is an RFC. How is this important? > By my count you have overflowed cb in struct sk_buff and are stomping on > _skb_refdest. For patch1/3 I count 56/48, then for patch3 I get 48/48. Jan, you might do the conversion to a pointer in patch1/3 to avoid bisect breakage. > If you are going to go crazy and pass things is there a reason you do > not add a patch to pass the bsd SCM_CREDS? That information seems more > relevant in a security context and for making security decisions than > about half the information you are passing. > > Eric - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Software Engineer Kernel Security AMER ENG Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635 Internal: (81) 32635 Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
