Hello, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:21:10PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > For non-priviliged users, something along the lines of per session > cpu autogroup might make sense. But even then if some IO is submitted > from that autoblkgroup, kernel can't claim that memory till IO is > completed. > > So per cgroup number of request will probably be a problem even if > kenrel managed those completely. My point was that trying to solve all the policy decisions in kernel proper is not a very good idea. > So are you planning to put a patch in kernel to disallow cgroup creation > for non-priviliged users? No, I'm not gonna break the current users. It's just not the direction I want to take cgroup towards and the current breakages will remain broken. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
