Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This patch implements per-blkg request_list. Each blkg has its own > request_list and any IO allocates its request from the matching blkg > making blkcgs completely isolated in terms of request allocation. So, nr_requests is now actually nr_requests * # of blk cgroups. Is that right? Are you at all concerned about the amount of memory that can be tied up as the number of cgroups increases? Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
