Hello, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:54:01AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > This patch implements per-blkg request_list. Each blkg has its own > > request_list and any IO allocates its request from the matching blkg > > making blkcgs completely isolated in terms of request allocation. > > So, nr_requests is now actually nr_requests * # of blk cgroups. Is that > right? Are you at all concerned about the amount of memory that can be > tied up as the number of cgroups increases? Yeah, I thought about it and I don't think there's a single good solution here. The other extreme would be splitting nr_requests by the number of cgroups but that seems even worse - each cgroup should be able to hit maximum throughput. Given that a lot of workloads tend to regulate themselves before hitting nr_requests, I think it's best to leave it as-is and treat each cgroup as having separate channel for now. It's a configurable parameter after all. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
