On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 01/31, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 01/31/2011 12:26 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >>> This task_active_pid_ns() is misnamed(?) because it does matter only >>> for dead tasks? >> Actually this function is later used, for the unshare, to get the pid_ns >> of a specific task, not the current one. > Well, it is already used to get the pid_ns of !current task. > >> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/20/4585095 > The actual need for this change is that you are going to complicate > the things so that current->proxy->pid_ns != task_active_pid_ns(). > This makes me cry ;) Mmh, ok that makes sense. > Please don't forget, this patch is buggy, iirc... Ok, I will resend the cleanup patchset without this patch. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
