On 01/31, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 01/31/2011 12:26 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> >> This task_active_pid_ns() is misnamed(?) because it does matter only >> for dead tasks? > > Actually this function is later used, for the unshare, to get the pid_ns > of a specific task, not the current one. Well, it is already used to get the pid_ns of !current task. > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/20/4585095 The actual need for this change is that you are going to complicate the things so that current->proxy->pid_ns != task_active_pid_ns(). This makes me cry ;) Please don't forget, this patch is buggy, iirc... Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
