Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >| Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >| >|> Daniel Lezcano [daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx] wrote: >|> >|>>> Besides a realistic container-init would block such signals, in which case >|>>> the complexity in the kernel could be viewed as unnecessary. >|>> >|>> I am not sure it is good to have the pid 1 immune against signals sent >|>> from outside of the container. >|> >|> cinit is only immune to unhandled signals that terminate/stop the cinit. >|> If a handler is defined for SIGINT, a SIGINT from parent-ns will still be >|> delivered but a SIGINT from a descendant of cinit will be ignored. > > Sorry. Bad sentence. > > Yes, if a handler is defined, the signal will be delivered regardless of > sender's namespace. Great, thanks! -- Feri. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
