Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Daniel Lezcano [daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx] wrote: > >>> Besides a realistic container-init would block such signals, in which case >>> the complexity in the kernel could be viewed as unnecessary. >> >> I am not sure it is good to have the pid 1 immune against signals sent >> from outside of the container. > > cinit is only immune to unhandled signals that terminate/stop the cinit. > If a handler is defined for SIGINT, a SIGINT from parent-ns will still be > delivered but a SIGINT from a descendant of cinit will be ignored. So is it impossible to send SIGINT to cinit from the container, even if it has a handler for that? Your other reply (and the note in kill(2)) seems to say it's possible, so I'm confused again... -- Thanks, Feri. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
