Ferenc Wagner [wferi@xxxxxxx] wrote: | Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: | | > Daniel Lezcano [daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx] wrote: | > | >>> Besides a realistic container-init would block such signals, in which case | >>> the complexity in the kernel could be viewed as unnecessary. | >> | >> I am not sure it is good to have the pid 1 immune against signals sent | >> from outside of the container. | > | > cinit is only immune to unhandled signals that terminate/stop the cinit. | > If a handler is defined for SIGINT, a SIGINT from parent-ns will still be | > delivered but a SIGINT from a descendant of cinit will be ignored. Sorry. Bad sentence. Yes, if a handler is defined, the signal will be delivered regardless of sender's namespace. Thanks, Suka _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
