OL> Would this compile without CONFIG_NET ? without CONFIG_NET_NS ? Nope, but it does depend on CONFIG_CHECKPOINT, of course. I'll add some Kconfig magic to try to straighten that out. OL> How can a user ask to not checkpoint the network-ns ? (e.g. in OL> a subtree checkpoint) Do we really want to start adding fine-grained control over everything that we checkpoint? Can you ask it to not checkpoint the ipc_ns, uts_ns, etc? The previous example of this was connected sockets, which I think is different, given the potential for a long delay before restart ensuring the sockets will be dead anyway. OL> Is there a reason not to collect all addresses into one buffer OL> (can there be more than a page worth of them ?) and write in one OL> go ? I don't really see anywhere that the list is bounded. I'd say that in most cases each interface will only have one address anyway. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
