On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Dan Smith wrote: > OL> Would this compile without CONFIG_NET ? without CONFIG_NET_NS ? > > Nope, but it does depend on CONFIG_CHECKPOINT, of course. I'll add > some Kconfig magic to try to straighten that out. > > OL> How can a user ask to not checkpoint the network-ns ? (e.g. in > OL> a subtree checkpoint) > > Do we really want to start adding fine-grained control over everything > that we checkpoint? Can you ask it to not checkpoint the ipc_ns, > uts_ns, etc? Basically yes. So far we didn't address how to do that. With network-ns it's a bit different, because, iiuc, it will require root for a restart even of a subtree checkpoint (that doesn't care about pids), just by being there. > The previous example of this was connected sockets, > which I think is different, given the potential for a long delay > before restart ensuring the sockets will be dead anyway. Agreed. Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
