Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx): >> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx): >>>> Based on original work from Serge Hallyn. >>> Needed the following patch on top of that. Otherwise the >>> whole set looks good to me, thanks! >> Great, thanks for the fixups. >> >> >>> (Oh, one other note, the default #ifdef for NR_eclone actually >>> is different depending on whether we're on a c/r kernel or not, >>> unfortunately :(. I'm leaving it as the non-c/r kernel value >>> for now.) >> Right.. I was thinking that the syscall numbers for eclone should >> precede those for checkpoint and restart in the c/r patch set. Thoughts >> on that? > > Yes, I was thinking the same thing. Good idea - will do in v19-rc2. Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
