On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx): > > Based on original work from Serge Hallyn. > > Needed the following patch on top of that. Otherwise the > whole set looks good to me, thanks! Great, thanks for the fixups. > (Oh, one other note, the default #ifdef for NR_eclone actually > is different depending on whether we're on a c/r kernel or not, > unfortunately :(. I'm leaving it as the non-c/r kernel value > for now.) Right.. I was thinking that the syscall numbers for eclone should precede those for checkpoint and restart in the c/r patch set. Thoughts on that? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
