Re: [PATCH 3/9] user-cr: s390 eclone wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx):
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx):
> > > Based on original work from Serge Hallyn.
> > 
> > Needed the following patch on top of that.  Otherwise the
> > whole set looks good to me, thanks!
> 
> Great, thanks for the fixups.
> 
> 
> > (Oh, one other note, the default #ifdef for NR_eclone actually
> > is different depending on whether we're on a c/r kernel or not,
> > unfortunately :(.  I'm leaving it as the non-c/r kernel value
> > for now.)
> 
> Right.. I was thinking that the syscall numbers for eclone should
> precede those for checkpoint and restart in the c/r patch set.  Thoughts
> on that?

Yes, I was thinking the same thing.

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux