Re: [PATCH 1/4] signals: SEND_SIG_NOINFO should be considered as SI_FROMUSER()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Perhaps, we should add the comment to explain that both SI_FROMUSER()
> and si_fromuser() are only valid in the sending pathes.

Yes.  Also now that you put them both in a sentence together, it is clear
that it is insane to have two different things with those two names that
differ only in capitalization.


Thanks,
Roland
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux