On 10/03, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> static void reparent_thread(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
> struct list_head *dead)
> {
> - if (p->pdeath_signal)
> - group_send_sig_info(p->pdeath_signal, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, p);
> + if (p->pdeath_signal) {
> + struct siginfo info;
> +
> + info.si_code = SI_USER;
> + info.si_signo = p->pdeath_signal;
> + info.si_errno = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + info.si_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(father, task_active_pid_ns(p));
> + info.si_uid = __task_cred(father)->uid;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + group_send_sig_info(p->pdeath_signal, &info, p);
> + }
I think the patch is correct.
But afaics we should clarify the "from user" semantics and fix
send_signal() instead.
What do you think about this simple series? (the last 2 patches
are pure cosmetic and off-topic).
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
