On 10/06, Roland McGrath wrote: > > This whole series looks fine to me. I think in commenting and cleaning up > any of this, it bears explicit mention that (almost) every signal is > potentially reduced to SI_USER. Yes, > but your logs and comments are not explicit about the relationship > between that logic and what's implicit in the queue-exhaustion behavior. Yes. the changelog for 3/4 mentions that this SI_USER doesn't really mean SI_FROMUSER(), but I agree I should have been more explicit. Perhaps, we should add the comment to explain that both SI_FROMUSER() and si_fromuser() are only valid in the sending pathes. Fortunately get_signal_to_deliver and friends do not care about the origination of the signal. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
