On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:32:29 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:07:18 +0900 (JST) > > Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Hi Ryo, > >>> > >>> The page_cgroup seems to be stable in the latest kernel. > >>> I'd like to know whether you have a plan or schedule to release > >>> a new version of bio-cgroup against latest kernel. > >> I have a plan on doing this. > >> > >> I thought I would start to implement it once the implementation of > >> memory cgroup got almost done. If you say the code of page_cgroup is > >> fixed, I'll start it from now on. I guess it'll be done in two weeks. > >> > > > > code to page_cgroup itself will not be changed. (I hope) > > possible change will be > > - new flags > > - support to SwapCache > > - swap_cgroup support (will be done independenly from page_cgroup.) > > > > API of > > lookup_page_cgroup() > > lock_page_cgroup() > > PCG_USED bit > > > > will not change, I think. > > I think you should not wait for stabilization, rather build on mmotm (-mm). Use > it and complain if it changes too often or becomes unusable for you. > I think so, too ;) -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
