KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:07:18 +0900 (JST) > Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Hi Ryo, >>> >>> The page_cgroup seems to be stable in the latest kernel. >>> I'd like to know whether you have a plan or schedule to release >>> a new version of bio-cgroup against latest kernel. >> I have a plan on doing this. >> >> I thought I would start to implement it once the implementation of >> memory cgroup got almost done. If you say the code of page_cgroup is >> fixed, I'll start it from now on. I guess it'll be done in two weeks. >> > > code to page_cgroup itself will not be changed. (I hope) > possible change will be > - new flags > - support to SwapCache > - swap_cgroup support (will be done independenly from page_cgroup.) > > API of > lookup_page_cgroup() > lock_page_cgroup() > PCG_USED bit > > will not change, I think. I think you should not wait for stabilization, rather build on mmotm (-mm). Use it and complain if it changes too often or becomes unusable for you. -- Balbir _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
