Re: About bio-cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:07:18 +0900 (JST)
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > Hi Ryo,
> > 
> > The page_cgroup seems to be stable in the latest kernel.
> > I'd like to know whether you have a plan or schedule to release
> > a new version of bio-cgroup against latest kernel.
> 
> I have a plan on doing this.
> 
> I thought I would start to implement it once the implementation of
> memory cgroup got almost done. If you say the code of page_cgroup is
> fixed, I'll start it from now on. I guess it'll be done in two weeks.
> 

code to page_cgroup itself will not be changed. (I hope)
possible change will be
  - new flags
  - support to SwapCache
  - swap_cgroup support (will be done independenly from page_cgroup.)

API of
   lookup_page_cgroup()
   lock_page_cgroup()
   PCG_USED bit

will not change, I think.

Thanks,
-Kame

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux