Balbir Singh wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Balbir Singh wrote: >>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>>>> Could we make the user interface similar to the one in the memory >>>>> controller please! It would make it easier for users to configure >>>>> and control both. >>>> Do you mean by merging the similar code or by making them look like >>>> the same? If the second, than can you point at least one difference >>>> except for "usage" vs "usage_in_bytes" (and similar) naming? >>>> >>> I meant similar naming, it makes it is easier if the naming convention >>> is the same. >> Ok. It looks like the naming in the memcontrol.c has changed after I >> copied it from there :) >> >> BTW, after Andrew accept these patches I think I will spend some time >> thinking about how to consolidate the res_counter files. >> > > Yes, we need to do that. Paul Menage wanted to pull in resource counters No, please, no :) Let's have them splitted apart. I think that the resource counter abstraction can be used in other places than the control groups... > into cgroups. Also, I'd like to be able to share res_counters between > container groups or at-least support a hierarchy. We could discuss this > at that point and/or send out an RFC to get more comments. > >> Thanks, >> Pavel > > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
