Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Balbir Singh wrote: >> Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>>> Could we make the user interface similar to the one in the memory >>>> controller please! It would make it easier for users to configure >>>> and control both. >>> Do you mean by merging the similar code or by making them look like >>> the same? If the second, than can you point at least one difference >>> except for "usage" vs "usage_in_bytes" (and similar) naming? >>> >> I meant similar naming, it makes it is easier if the naming convention >> is the same. > > Ok. It looks like the naming in the memcontrol.c has changed after I > copied it from there :) > > BTW, after Andrew accept these patches I think I will spend some time > thinking about how to consolidate the res_counter files. > Yes, we need to do that. Paul Menage wanted to pull in resource counters into cgroups. Also, I'd like to be able to share res_counters between container groups or at-least support a hierarchy. We could discuss this at that point and/or send out an RFC to get more comments. > Thanks, > Pavel -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
