On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:15:36 -0700 Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew wrote: > > And I think that's OK, because we don't care about git bisectability with > > CONFIG_CGROUPS=y (I think?) Anyone who is bisecting through the middle of > > the containers patch series is not searching for a containers problem, so > > they can just configure it all off. > > Ok - I guess. > > In *-mm, this seems fine. I'd have figured that in Linus's tree, a wider > variety of people will be bisecting, some of them with CONFIG_CGROUPS=y > who don't even know what a CGROUP is, and so we'd want bisect to work > for them. Well obviously the situation is less than ideal, but it's livable with. If one of their bisection points precedes the crgroups patch series, their `make oldconfig' will knock out cgroups for them anyway, so when their bisection cursor moves within or after the cgroups patches, they'll still have CONFIG_CGROUPS=n. Serendipity. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
