Paul M: This patch doesn't build for me in the following case. If I apply the rest of the containersv11 patches, it builds, but if I happen to bisect into this set of patches having applied only: task-containersv11-basic-task-container-framework.patch while using sn2_defconfig (with CONFIG_CGROUPS=y), then a build for arch ia64 fails with: $ make kernel/cgroup.o CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh <stdin>:1389:2: warning: #warning syscall revokeat not implemented <stdin>:1393:2: warning: #warning syscall frevoke not implemented CC kernel/cgroup.o kernel/cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_new_inode': kernel/cgroup.c:227: error: variable 'cgroup_backing_dev_info' has initializer but incomplete type kernel/cgroup.c:228: error: unknown field 'capabilities' specified in initializer kernel/cgroup.c:228: error: 'BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_DIRTY' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/cgroup.c:228: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/cgroup.c:228: error: for each function it appears in.) kernel/cgroup.c:228: error: 'BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/cgroup.c:228: warning: excess elements in struct initializer kernel/cgroup.c:228: warning: (near initialization for 'cgroup_backing_dev_info') kernel/cgroup.c:227: error: storage size of 'cgroup_backing_dev_info' isn't known kernel/cgroup.c:227: warning: unused variable 'cgroup_backing_dev_info' make[1]: *** [kernel/cgroup.o] Error 1 make: *** [kernel/cgroup.o] Error 2 I haven't tested building other partial applications of the containersv11 patch set; any initial sequence of them should build. ... also ... too bad the names of these patches all have 'container' in them, not 'cgroup'. I realize how this came to be, due to changing container to cgroup after these patches were named, but it sure would be nice if the final patch set record that gets layed down in Linus's history showed the correct name of 'cgroup' in these patch names. Well ... nice in my view ... such a patch rename would create more work for Andrew, so I can't claim to know what he will think of this patch name detail. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers