Andrew wrote:
> And I think that's OK, because we don't care about git bisectability with
> CONFIG_CGROUPS=y (I think?) Anyone who is bisecting through the middle of
> the containers patch series is not searching for a containers problem, so
> they can just configure it all off.
Ok - I guess.
In *-mm, this seems fine. I'd have figured that in Linus's tree, a wider
variety of people will be bisecting, some of them with CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
who don't even know what a CGROUP is, and so we'd want bisect to work
for them.
But you (Andrew) would know better than I.
> that'll be OK. The "task-containers" text appears only in the filenmaes in
> the -mm patch series. Those filenames don't make an appearance in the git
> tree at all, so I didn't bother renaming all the files.
Ah - ok - good.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
