Re: [RFC][PATCH] allow "unlimited" limit value.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/25/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> nit pick, should be memory.limit_in_bytes
>

Can we reconsider this? I do think that plain "limit" would enable you
to have a more consistent API across all resource counters users.

I realise that there's the issue that if someone's never heard of the
memory controller and never read any docs for it then they might  be
very briefly uncertain as to the units, but really, that's what
documentation is for.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux