Dave Hansen <hansendc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 09:33 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>>
>> I still prefer that we forego that kthread, and just work toward
>> allowing pid1 to exit. Really I think the crufty /proc/<pid> handling
>> is the only reason we were going to punt on that for now.
>
> It's everything _but_ the /proc/<pid> stuff. /proc/{mem,cpu}info and
> friends are the ones suspiciously tied to pid 1.
The files and directories affected by the oddity you spotted are:
/proc/
/proc/self
/proc/<pid>
That is the complete list.
Only /proc/self and /proc/<pid> Actually test for the presence of pid == 1.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
