Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> So how do you see us enforcing pid1's existance? Somehow keep it from >> fully exiting, or just kill all the processes in it's namespace if it >> exits? what about a kthread that would be spawned when a task is cloned in an unshared pid namespace ? This is an extra cost in term of tasks. > Killing all other processes in the namespace when pid1 exits is what > I implemented last time around. this looks like a sane thing to do. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
