On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 09:33 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>
> I still prefer that we forego that kthread, and just work toward
> allowing pid1 to exit. Really I think the crufty /proc/<pid> handling
> is the only reason we were going to punt on that for now.
It's everything _but_ the /proc/<pid> stuff. /proc/{mem,cpu}info and
friends are the ones suspiciously tied to pid 1.
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
