å 2010-11-29äç 10:49 +0800ïAmÃrico Wangåéï > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:06AM +0800, Microcai wrote: > >å 2010-11-28æç 20:11 +0100ïSamuel Thibaultåéï > >> Microcai, le Sun 28 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0800, a Ãcrit : > >> > So, here is the design according to your description .. > >> > > >> > JUST export /dev/fb and /dev/pts and /dev/console > >> > The kernel use /dev/console, but invisible. > >> > The rest of the world uses /dev/pts > >> > > >> > Make init using /dev/fb to display boot message, and agetty runs > >> > on /dev/pts > >> > >> Errr, but that already exists, that's fbterm... > >> > >> Samuel > > > >Every time someone try to implement something , some other guy will jump > >out and say, that already exist, in user-space ..... blablablabla > > > > Remember, remember, kernel provides a mechanism, not a policy. > (From this point, auto-groups *does* break it.) YES, but handle UNICODE font is a policy???????? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-console" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
