On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:06AM +0800, Microcai wrote: >å 2010-11-28æç 20:11 +0100ïSamuel Thibaultåéï >> Microcai, le Sun 28 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0800, a Ãcrit : >> > So, here is the design according to your description .. >> > >> > JUST export /dev/fb and /dev/pts and /dev/console >> > The kernel use /dev/console, but invisible. >> > The rest of the world uses /dev/pts >> > >> > Make init using /dev/fb to display boot message, and agetty runs >> > on /dev/pts >> >> Errr, but that already exists, that's fbterm... >> >> Samuel > >Every time someone try to implement something , some other guy will jump >out and say, that already exist, in user-space ..... blablablabla > Remember, remember, kernel provides a mechanism, not a policy. (From this point, auto-groups *does* break it.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-console" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html