R. Diez <rdiez-2006@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Unlikely as you didn't take them for the last merge window, let alone 6.2. > > That said, you did take my iteratorisation patches in 6.3 - but that > > shouldn't > > affect 6.2 unless someone backported them. > > Please note that 6.2 is not affected, the breakage occurred afterwards. See > the bug report here for more information: Ah, right - so the 6.2 in the subject is the last definitely working version. David
