Attaching updated patch. On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:47 PM Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes. I'll put a comment to avoid confusion. > > Regards, > Shyam > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:08 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes, missed them in the first place. Then I would suggest to list them > > in order to avoid confusion. > > -- > > Best regards, > > Pavel Shilovsky > > > > вт, 9 февр. 2021 г. в 12:06, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:58 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h > > > > index 50fcb65920e8..1a1f9f4ae80a 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h > > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h > > > > @@ -1704,7 +1704,8 @@ static inline bool is_retryable_error(int error) > > > > #define CIFS_ECHO_OP 0x080 /* echo request */ > > > > #define CIFS_OBREAK_OP 0x0100 /* oplock break request */ > > > > #define CIFS_NEG_OP 0x0200 /* negotiate request */ > > > > -#define CIFS_OP_MASK 0x0380 /* mask request type */ > > > > +#define CIFS_SESS_OP 0x2000 /* session setup request */ > > > > +#define CIFS_OP_MASK 0x2380 /* mask request type */ > > > > > > > > Why skipping 0x400, 0x800 and 0x1000 flags? > > > > > > They were already reserved. See cifsglob.h > > > > > > #define CIFS_HAS_CREDITS 0x0400 /* already has credits */ > > > #define CIFS_TRANSFORM_REQ 0x0800 /* transform request before sending */ > > > #define CIFS_NO_SRV_RSP 0x1000 /* there is no server response */ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Steve > > > > -- > Regards, > Shyam -- Regards, Shyam
Attachment:
0001-cifs-New-optype-for-session-operations.patch
Description: Binary data
