On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:13:35PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > > I recently encountered the following strange behavior as mentioned in > > this post from several years ago: > > > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2009-February/004079.html > > > > I'm currently running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on desktop and server, so > > I took some time to try the latest packaged versions of Samba and > > the kernel to make sure that the issue had not yet been fixed. > > > > Client: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Kernel 3.11.0-13-generic > > Server: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Samba 3.6.20 and Kernel 3.5.0-43-generic > > > > I tried many other combinations and the behavior is the same. It > > looks like setting default ACLs somehow interacts with the > > non-default ACLs and vice versa. > > I tried this here to Samba 3.6 with slightly different results: > 1) If I set both a default and non-default ACL that seems to work > 2) but as you and Rob saw, if I setfacl a default ACL it removes the non- > default ACL > 3) and if I setfacl a non-default ACL it removes the default ACL > > So for case 2 and 3 the behavior is different than for a local file system. > This may be a server bug. Can you send me a wireshark trace ? > For Samba 4 and Samba 4.2-pre (master) - I get an error not supported on this > infolevel 512 (Set POSIX ACL). You're running the wrong server :-). You need smbd running, not the source4 server. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
