---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:13 PM Subject: Samba POSIX ACL behavior To: "linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, samba-technical <samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx> > I recently encountered the following strange behavior as mentioned in > this post from several years ago: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2009-February/004079.html > > I'm currently running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on desktop and server, so > I took some time to try the latest packaged versions of Samba and > the kernel to make sure that the issue had not yet been fixed. > > Client: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Kernel 3.11.0-13-generic > Server: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Samba 3.6.20 and Kernel 3.5.0-43-generic > > I tried many other combinations and the behavior is the same. It > looks like setting default ACLs somehow interacts with the > non-default ACLs and vice versa. I tried this here to Samba 3.6 with slightly different results: 1) If I set both a default and non-default ACL that seems to work 2) but as you and Rob saw, if I setfacl a default ACL it removes the non-default ACL 3) and if I setfacl a non-default ACL it removes the default ACL So for case 2 and 3 the behavior is different than for a local file system. This may be a server bug. For Samba 4 and Samba 4.2-pre (master) - I get an error not supported on this infolevel 512 (Set POSIX ACL). -- Thanks, Steve -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
