On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:13:35PM -0600, Steve French wrote: >> > I recently encountered the following strange behavior as mentioned in >> > this post from several years ago: >> > >> > https://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2009-February/004079.html >> > >> > I'm currently running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on desktop and server, so >> > I took some time to try the latest packaged versions of Samba and >> > the kernel to make sure that the issue had not yet been fixed. >> > >> > Client: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Kernel 3.11.0-13-generic >> > Server: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Samba 3.6.20 and Kernel 3.5.0-43-generic >> > >> > I tried many other combinations and the behavior is the same. It >> > looks like setting default ACLs somehow interacts with the >> > non-default ACLs and vice versa. >> >> I tried this here to Samba 3.6 with slightly different results: >> 1) If I set both a default and non-default ACL that seems to work >> 2) but as you and Rob saw, if I setfacl a default ACL it removes the non- >> default ACL >> 3) and if I setfacl a non-default ACL it removes the default ACL >> >> So for case 2 and 3 the behavior is different than for a local file system. >> This may be a server bug. > > Can you send me a wireshark trace ? > >> For Samba 4 and Samba 4.2-pre (master) - I get an error not supported on this >> infolevel 512 (Set POSIX ACL). > > You're running the wrong server :-). You need smbd running, not the source4 > server. steven@steven-GA-970A-DS3:/etc$ ps -A | grep "mbd" 2321 ? 00:00:00 smbd 19715 ? 00:00:00 smbd 19721 ? 00:00:00 smbd This is smbd Version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-72b240f -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
