Re: should we change the name of get/setcifsacl ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:05:03 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The nfs4 ACL tools are called nfs4_getfacl and nfs4_setfacl. I think it
> > would probably be good for consistency's sake to change the name of the
> > cifs variants to cifs_getfacl and cifs_setfacl.
> >
> > Any thoughts or objections?
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> 
> I have no objection/preference for the tools' names.
> But there is getfacl and setfacl. And I think richacl has tool/s
> such as setrichacl.
> 

Fair enough then. If the richacl tools are named along those
lines, I'll just leave the cifs ones named as they are.

Thanks.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux