I mildly prefer get/setcifsacl (shorter) but don't have a strong opinion on the tool name. On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The nfs4 ACL tools are called nfs4_getfacl and nfs4_setfacl. I think it > > would probably be good for consistency's sake to change the name of the > > cifs variants to cifs_getfacl and cifs_setfacl. > > > > Any thoughts or objections? > > > > -- > > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I have no objection/preference for the tools' names. > But there is getfacl and setfacl. And I think richacl has tool/s > such as setrichacl. > > Regards, > > Shirish > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
