Re: should we change the name of get/setcifsacl ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The nfs4 ACL tools are called nfs4_getfacl and nfs4_setfacl. I think it
> would probably be good for consistency's sake to change the name of the
> cifs variants to cifs_getfacl and cifs_setfacl.
>
> Any thoughts or objections?
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
>

I have no objection/preference for the tools' names.
But there is getfacl and setfacl. And I think richacl has tool/s
such as setrichacl.

Regards,

Shirish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux