On 5/17/23 09:15, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 10.05.2023 20:19:38, Vincent Mailhol wrote: [...]ISO 11898-1 is such a rabbit hole... sights...How do we proceed? I like Marek's approach of defining the delay first in the driver and then moving it to a common header in the second patch to facilitate backporting. Do we agree on the maximum number of bits to wait in the worst case?
Is any further change expected from me to this patch ?
